Melissa Kester, LMFT

Melissa Kester, LMFT provides therapy for individualscouples and adult family members. By looking into past and present relationships, we work to develop new patterns and capacities with our clients to allow them more fulfilling relationships.

We are a community of engaged and thoughtful, systemically trained practitioners. Melissa practices indepth psychotherapy that incorporates systemic, relational, contemplative and psychodynamic therapy.

Co-Regulation vs. Co-Dependence: Loving Boundaries That Interrupt Adapted Child Dynamics and Restore Dignity to the Relationship

What co-regulation is

You know that moment when you’re flooded—heart racing, thoughts spinning—and your partner says your name softly, sits closer, and your body drops a notch? Your breathing slows. You feel less alone. That’s co-regulation: the way a safe presence can help your nervous system settle so you can think, speak, and stay connected again.

I think of it as emotional gravity. We each bring an energetic pull into the room—stress, fear, tenderness, irritation—and we affect each other. Like atoms, we bump up against one another. But unlike atoms, we don’t want collisions to be the norm. What helps a relationship last is learning to stay in our own safe orbit—grounded and accountable—while still checking in on both sides: I feel you. I’m here. I’m not leaving you alone in it. And also: I’m flooded. Do you have time or space to talk right now?

When co-regulation gets twisted

But in real relationships, co-regulation can quietly drift into something else—emotional outsourcing. It often starts with good intentions: one of you is activated and reaches for the other, hoping for steadiness. The other tries to help. And then the request sharpens: “Say it differently.” “Apologize the right way.” “Don’t walk away.” Suddenly, the message isn’t, “Help me settle,” it’s “You need to regulate me.”

That’s the pivot point where support becomes an expectation, comfort becomes a requirement, and you’ve crossed into: “You’re responsible for my emotions.” And to be clear: this usually isn’t malicious—it’s protective. In RLT terms, it’s the adapted child trying to secure closeness by recruiting your partner into managing your inner life. That’s not connection—that’s control in a softer outfit. And over time, it can create a codependent pull: one partner feeling pressured to perform the “right” response, the other feeling abandoned unless they get it.

Adult-to-Adult: Love and Limits in Co-Regulation

In Relational Life Therapy, co-regulation works best when it stays adult-to-adult—when the Wise Adult is driving. That means: I can want you, need you, reach for you… and still be responsible for my inner life and my behavior. Love and limits aren’t opposites here—they’re partners. Love keeps us connected. Limits keep us dignified.

Co-regulation (Wise Adult–led)

Co-regulation is borrowing steadiness—with consent—while you stay responsible for your emotions and your behavior.

  • “I’m getting worked up. Can you stay close while I take a breath?”

  • “Can you hold my hand for 30 seconds? You don’t have to fix anything.”

  • “I want to talk about this without hurting each other. Can we pause and restart?”

When co-regulation shifts into a codependent pull (Adapted Child–led)

This is the pivot point where closeness becomes a way to manage distress—recruiting your partner into regulation through reassurance, agreement, or urgency.

  • “Just tell me I’m right so I can calm down.”

  • “If you don’t respond, I’m going to lose it.”

  • “You need to make me feel better—now.”

Love and limits (keeps it adult-to-adult)

  • “I’m with you—and I’m not willing to do this through blame.”

  • “I care about you. I’m taking 10 minutes to regulate and I will come back.”

  • “Yes to connection, no to pressure. Let’s slow down.”

How this shows up in real couples

Most couples don’t get stuck because they don’t love each other. They get stuck because one nervous system speeds up, the other shuts down, and both reach for protection. One partner reaches harder—more words, more urgency, more “we have to talk right now.” The other pulls back—less eye contact, less talking, more distance, more shutdown. Underneath both is the same longing: “Make it safe again.”

This is where co-regulation can quietly flip into a codependent pattern. The more one partner presses for reassurance, the more the other feels controlled. The more the other withdraws to calm down, the more the first feels abandoned. We leave the relational “us” and take up the individually empowered positions of “me vs. you.” Suddenly you’re not fighting about the original issue—you’re fighting about access: Are you with me? Are you available? Can I count on you?

In RLT terms, this is the adapted child on both sides running the show. One adapted child may protest (“come close—now”), while the other protects (“back up—I can’t breathe”). Neither is wrong for having the need. The trouble is the strategy. Relationships take strategy—not because love isn’t real, but because our nervous systems get organized around protection. And the work is learning new moves that keep you adult-to-adult: staying present without pressure, taking space without disappearing, and finding a rhythm where both partners can say, “I’m here—and I have limits.”

Love and Limits, the Orange, and Co-Regulation

Orbit is the goal. The orange peel is how we get there.
If co-regulation is emotional gravity, then boundaries are what keep gravity from becoming collision. Terry Real describes boundaries like an orange peel—our psychological skin. The inside peel is containment: staying in my own safe orbit so my Adapted Child doesn’t “juice” all over you through blame, urgency, or sharpness. The outside peel is protection: staying in my own safe orbit so I don’t get pulled into managing your inner life or performing reassurance on demand. This is what “love and limits” looks like in motion: I’m here with you—and I’m still responsible for me.
In other words, we can be close enough to feel each other, without crashing into each other—or leaking reactivity all over the relationship.

Love + Limits in Co-Regulation (a simple strategy)

  1. Containment (inside boundary): name your state
    “I’m getting worked up.” / “I’m flooded.”

  2. Containment: slow your impact
    “I want to stay kind—give me a breath.”
    “I’m going to slow down so I don’t get sharp.”

  3. Connection: signal “I’m here” (no fixing required)
    “I’m here with you.”
    “I care about this, and I care about us.”

  4. Consent: ask for time/space instead of demanding access
    “Do you have time or space to talk right now?”
    “Can you do ten minutes now—or should we pick a time?”

  5. Protection (outside boundary): refuse the codependent pull without withdrawing love
    “I’m with you—and I’m not willing to do this through blame or pressure.”
    “Yes to connection, no to pressure. Let’s slow down.”

  6. Structure: if you need a pause, add a return plan
    “I’m taking 10 minutes to regulate, and I will come back.”
    “Let’s pause and restart so we don’t hurt each other.”

Two common roles, three relational moves (Adapted Child → Wise Adult)

When one nervous system speeds up and the other shuts down, it’s easy for the Adapted Child to grab the mic. The goal isn’t to shame it—it’s to translate it. Same need, new strategy.

If you’re the one who speeds up

Relational move: slow down + ask cleanly + name a return time.

  • Adapted Child: “We have to talk right now. Don’t leave me.”
    Wise Adult: “I’m starting to feel tense, and I want closeness—not a fight. Can we take a 20-minute timeout and come back to this?”

  • Adapted Child: “Answer me. Fix this. Say it the right way.”
    Wise Adult: “I know I tend to push through. I need to slow down. Do you have time and space to talk right now?”

  • Adapted Child: “If not now, you don’t care.”
    Wise Adult: “If now isn’t good, can we pick a time? I do better when I know when we’re coming back.”

If you’re the one who shuts down

Relational move: take space without disappearing + lower intensity + offer a clear return.

  • Adapted Child: “I can’t. This is too much. I’m out.”
    Wise Adult: “I’m starting to shut down. I care about you, and I need a 20-minute timeout to regulate. I will come back.”

  • Adapted Child: “Stop. You’re too much.”
    Wise Adult: “I’m here, and I’m getting overwhelmed. Can we slow this down so I can stay present?”

  • Adapted Child: “I have to go—deal with it.”
    Wise Adult: “I know this is important, and I need to return to work. Can we talk about it tonight at ____?”

Reader note: Your love is important—and it deserves a clear time to return to each other.

Repair, the RLT way

Repair doesn’t require perfect language—you need willingness. A sincere return matters more than a flawless script.

And this is where this stance can be so grounding: no one can make us feel anything. We can be deeply impacted. We can get triggered. We can get flooded. But when we speak as if our partner is the sole author of our inner world, repair turns into prosecution. Repair becomes possible when we shift into agency: I got activated, and I chose a strategy. Now I’m choosing a different one.

A simple repair sequence

  1. Regulate first, then return—with a time
    If you’re flooded, take a pause that includes a clear return plan. The difference between a helpful time-out and withdrawal is simple: you come back.

  2. Re-enter with intention
    Am I coming back to connect, or to convince?

  3. Speak in a structured way (so you don’t spiral)

    • What happened (observable)

    • The meaning/story I made

    • What I felt

    • What I’m asking for now
      Example: “When I heard ____, I told myself ____. I felt ____. What I’m asking for is ____.”

  4. The listener receives (without counterattacking)
    Acknowledge impact first, own what’s yours, then offer one doable next step.

  5. Name the new strategy
    Close repair with one concrete change you’ll practice next time.

Two micro repair scripts

For the partner who speeds up:
“Earlier, I pushed and got intense. The story I told myself was that I was alone in it. I’m sorry for the pressure—that wasn’t fair. What I want now is to restart slower. Can we take this one step at a time?”

For the partner who shuts down:
“Earlier, I checked out. I got overwhelmed and protected myself by pulling away. I can see how that landed as abandonment. I’m here now—can we restart slower? And if I need a pause again, I’ll name a time to return.”

Closing and next steps

Co-regulation is one of the best parts of being in a relationship: we settle in each other’s presence. But support works best when it’s paired with love and limits—when we stay close without colliding, and when we remember that no one is responsible for managing someone else’s inner life. When we reach for support and start treating our partner as responsible for our state, the relational “us” starts to disappear. The way back is strategy: clear pauses, clean requests, and repair that restores dignity for both people.

If you’d like support in practicing these skills, I offer therapy consults and teach them in my Relational Wisdom workshop this March (for couples and individuals). If you’re curious about a consult or the workshop, reach out at melissa@madisonmft.com or visit MadisonMFT.com.

Photo by Dương Hữu on Unsplash

Photo by Dương Hữu on Unsplash

Melissa Kester, LMFT | 731 8th Street SE Washington, DC 20003
info@madisonmft.com  |  646-205-7606